#16
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Although you can File | Import | a Folder (and recurse) to any point in the Data Explorer, you can't "push" changes outward from UR - file rename, move folder (or maybe I'm missing something). If you make changes (file rename) thru the Windows Explorer Folder Display, then re-sync you end up with "orphaned" Items. This method of folder import and re-sync is more of a reflection, a passive response. In many cases my Data Explorer ends up looking like a file system anyway, even if I don't fully import folders. The absence of a File Manager mode in UR is puzzling - I have no idea how best to implement it. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Tree, thumbnails
Armsys, thank you very much for that. My first impression on trying out your suggestion was mild elation. There were all the thumbnails. It worked a treat.
But then synchronisation. Within UR Ctrl-shift-del deleted in Windows Explorer too. Great. Also, if I create a note in UR and synchronize, it appears in Windows Explorer. Great too. But, as Ashwken just said, other things don't work so well. If I delete a sub-directory and its files in Windows Explorer and then sync in UR, the effect is for that sub-directory and its files re-appear in Windows Explorer. And if I delete the sub-directory in UR using Ctrl-Shift-del, it doesn't work as it does on a file. The directory remain in place in Explorer. Also, after a bit of playing around my machine began to freeze up. Too much synching perhaps. I think actually, it is not worth the effort. I am better just to go over to Explorer for my photos. Essentially, anything that relies on synching, even if the synching were to be flawless, is difficult. One needs to remember the synching rules for a start. It really would be much better to have all the photos actually IN UR itself and nonetheless to have thumbnails! If the only way to obtain thumbnails is by holding externally, linking and then synching, thing become inherently awkward and inelegant. So I won't be using this procedure and will give up on storing more than odd photos in UR until it can be done internally. Maybe in UR4? But thanks for all the help! |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Hi StephenUK & ashwken
Alas, it's always my problem to see things a half cup full. I should have warned StephenUK to read the manual before venturing aggressive experiment with folder sychronization, especially the deletion part, which sometimes induces jaw dropping and/or cardiac anomaly. Neither did I expect all the worst scenarios occurring simultaneously. I was aware of all these discontents. On the other hand, what if you were in Kinook's shoes, how would you implement the folder things? That's the area you can help Kinook and UR users. For the photo database, I highly recommend ThumbsPlus (see http://www.cerious.com/). For the PaperPort, I've been an intensive user since 1995 on a daily basis. If you switch the image format from .max to .pdf, then you'll find a twilight zone between UR and PaperPort. Just my 2 cents. Armstrong Last edited by armsys; 01-14-2008 at 02:00 AM. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Paperport
Armstrong. Yes, I think "twilight zone" is a good description. I too have been using Paperport using the pdf option. I would just like to reach a point where I could use UR for everything, but probably I ask too much. But there is, presumably, Version 4, or 5, or 6 to come?..... It's just that I am getting older..... Many thanks for your suggestions. Stephen
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
That's my .02US which is now worth about .01US |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Are you using the current paid version or the older freeware: http://www.idimager.com/?page=freeware Also, there 's some interesting utilities on this page. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
I'm a licensed user v4.003 (latest as of a few days ago). I'll look @ the link. Thanks, Armstrong
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
ashwken & janrif,
Thanks a lot for shedding light onto IDImager. It looks promising. My recent primary use of ThumbsPlus is to review all ashwken's screenshots daily. It's extremely fast for such purpose. Yes, definitely I'll look into IDImager. I just don't see how UR could become a photo database given my experience with ThumbsPlus. Armstrong Last edited by armsys; 01-14-2008 at 10:32 AM. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
for faster viewing look @ irfanview @ URL http://www.irfanview.com/
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Any manipulation of images (an Active Response - deletions, alterations, renaming, folder structuring) needs to take place outside of UR in Windows Explorer, then brought into UR via File | Import | a Folder and used in conjunction with the *folder display. So long as you're ready to Store the images. Quote:
It will be interesting to see what lies ahead in the next release of UR. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
photo tracking
For those interested in tracking photos I would suggest a dedicated image catalog program like ACDSee
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
On the other hand, no products can prevail in the long run without the users' monetary support. Just my 2 cents. Armstrong |
|
|