maynard
05-05-2006, 09:21 PM
I have a huge file system data tree (1.5GB) that I want to import but I don't want to store everything in UR. So I repartitioned the data into two idential trees on the file system with all the big pdf files in one tree for linked import and the smaller files in the other tree for stored import.
I first ran the linked import in UR on the large files which ran perfectly. I then ran a second stored import on the other data tree which also ran fine, but on completion I ended up with two trees in UR; "<folder> and <folder> (2)". This isn't what I was expecting. Since the folder hierarchies for each imported tree were identical, I assumed that the items imported on each pass would be merged into one tree in UR.
What am I doing wrong here?
Thanks
Maynard
BTW. I did a store import of the entire tree as a test and UR handled it just fine. All the data imported without a glithc and the overall performance was great. Nice job.
I first ran the linked import in UR on the large files which ran perfectly. I then ran a second stored import on the other data tree which also ran fine, but on completion I ended up with two trees in UR; "<folder> and <folder> (2)". This isn't what I was expecting. Since the folder hierarchies for each imported tree were identical, I assumed that the items imported on each pass would be merged into one tree in UR.
What am I doing wrong here?
Thanks
Maynard
BTW. I did a store import of the entire tree as a test and UR handled it just fine. All the data imported without a glithc and the overall performance was great. Nice job.