#1
|
|||
|
|||
Unofficial plugin / extension system design notes
Here is a first draft at design notes for a Plugin / Extension system for Ultra
Recall. This is just technical, but there should also be thought put in to an Online Directory, Forums, and Rating Systems for Scripts (produced by Kinook or by 3rd parties). You might want to allow automated script installation... Basically what you do is just register a new File Extension and Mime Type in Windows, and then provide download links to files that are served with that extension and mime type. They then are automatically opened by UR (and after checking the CRYPTOGRAPHIC SIGNATURE, they are allowed to be installed). Otherwise it will show a Big Bad Warning before allowing the installation of untrusted plugins. So anyway... Here goes: Do *not* try to be language agnostic. Pick the language that you want to use, and then USE IT FULLY. Don't artificially handicap any of the power that the language, and the STANDARD LIBRARY OF THAT LANGUAGE (this is key!) has to offer. -= DATABASE RELATED APIs =- DB QUERY API. There should be an API that allows the user to QUERY the database for sequences of ITEMS, just in the same way that the Advanced Search dialog box allows. DO NOT PROVIDE DIRECT ACCESS TO SQL. You don't want to restrict your freedom to change the DB schema in the future, and we want scripts to be forward-compatible as much as possible. Items should be returned as objects that have members that represent the fields. Or perhaps there will simply be one member (e.g. "fields") that is a Dictionary (associative array) that maps Field Names to Field Values. Field Vales should be Strong Typed, meaning a Date field ought to have some language-specific DateTime object that represents those values. To change DB VALUES you then will either directly MUTATE (modify) a Value Object that you already hold a reference to, OR (In the case of Immutable Value Types) you create a new value, and insert it on the Item Object. TRANSACTION SUPPORT. Provide a simple wrapper for the SQLite transaction START/END calls, so that scripts can do their work inside nice transactions, yay! (Advanced Feature) SINGLE-COLUMN, or MULTI-COLUMN QUERY API. Provide an Query API that allows the programmer to pull only certain columns out of the DB. Say you only can what the Flag value is for the items that match your query... The result of the query would then NOT be a sequence of Object Items, but rather a sequence Flag Values (of whatever type the Flag is represented by). If you specify more than one column, then the result would be a sequence of sequences (tuples), with each sub-sequence containing the Values of the Columns for that particular Item. (Advanced Feature) LAZY QUERY ITERATION. Instead of returning full in-memory sequences, you can instead return Iterable Objects (how you do this depends on the language being used, of course). ITEM ID QUERY. Every item in the database should have a unique, global ID (in a particular .urd file) that can be used to retrieve it. I'm borrowing a lot of these concepts from the excellent Axiom database available for Python (it uses SQLite v. 3 under the hood) -= THREADING CONCERNS =- Without looking at your codebase I can't know what kind of threading model you utilize in UltraRecall. So it's pretty hard for me to say what kind of concerns you will have to deal with in keeping scripts Thread Safe. My basic thoughts are that all Scripting APIs (where ever possible) should do locking implicitly and automatically where needed. Script Programs should be allowed to spawn multiple threads, because sometimes you have to use threads to do certain things. However, I don't personally like writing multi-threaded programs very much. It's extremely difficult to do it well, and to not introduce horrible, impossible to debug errors in to your programs. That said, I would lean towards providing an asynchronous Reactor pattern implementation (event loop) that operates inside a single thread, and that multiple independent Scripts can use at the same time. This is the same event-driven model used in GUIs. If you use Python as the extension language, then Twisted is the obvious choice for this. You don't have to do any work here, and you give access to a tremendous amount of power. (I'm a committer on Twisted, so I'm biased, but it really is the best... -= DATA MODEL =- So, you ask, how do you represent the wide variety of content that UR can handle? Good question. I don't know. Lets take Rich Text as an example. I have no idea how you represent Item Content internally (as a Microsoft RTF document???), so I'm not sure what you will have to do to expose that content in a programmable fashion. Ideally, Scripts would be able to manipulate Rich Content in all of its detail. You may need to invent an XML Schema here, that you can map your internal representation on to. (X)HTML, anyone? Or if you could somehow use MS Word internally, then you can use the Word 2003 XML format, while though it is ugly, it is certainly usable and extremely feature-rich. So if you use XML, or something else, you will need to provide a DOM API, similar in nature to the DOM APIs provided in Javascript and by various XML parsers. If you use XML, then you can just grab one of the open source DOMs for your language of choice. Now, of course, The Tree in UltraRecall is fundamentally a DOM, and you may wish to provide some integration here, and use the same API for accessing the ULTRA RECALL DOM, and the various CONTENT DOMs. Maybe it call all be part of a single DOM (one big tree)? I'm just thinking out loud here.. and without knowing anything about the codebase I'm not sure what the best way forward would be... The DOMs I'm talking about above are fundamentally TEXT BASED. But that may not be entirely suitable for UR. You may want to provide a DOM that contains not just generic NODES, but Strongly Typed Objects (that can contain Strongly Typed Children Objects and Strongly Typed Attributes). -= GUI ACCESS =- So, scripts obviously need to be able to perform any actions that the user can perform through using the various menu items, shortcut keys, and buttons that are in the GUI. The script should also have access to the various Controls that fundamentally make up the UR GUI. E.g. The Script API should allow access to the various Panes, and it should be able to e.g. Make them wider. I don't talk here about *modifiying* anything that is *shown* in a pane, because that fundamentally belongs to the DB / DATA MODEL APIs. There should obviously be an API to read which Item is currently Selected in the Current Tab. And thus you can change the data on that Item, and it will reflect in the various Panes. An API to add new Tabs, enumerate and remove existing Tabs, and so on. Access to the clipboard ( though you could just let people use native OS-level access to the clipboard) instead of providing your own Scripting API for it. And so on... How hard all this is, and how it may be done of course depends on how you have written your GUI layers. Is it just straight MFC/win32 API? Scripts also need to be able to create their own GUI Controls and have them be integrated with the Standard Controls where needed. E.g. A Script should be able to provide a new toolbar, and you could then place, and customize that toolbar like any of the built-in ones. Scripts also need to be able to create their own Form Dialogs and Popup Windows, etc. You don't really need to do anything special here except choose a language that is powerful enough to access Windows APIs, and then Scripts can do anything they need to do. Some thought will need to go in to how, and at what level, GUI integration is allowed between Controls created by the Script and those created by UR. -= NETWORKING =- Network access is huge. E.g. I want a Plugin that lets be enter a Movie Name ( I have a database of all the DVDs in my collection), and it then pulls down all the metadata for that movie from IMDB in to the new Movie Item that I am inserting. Or I might write a plugin that syncs my Contacts with Gmail. As above, just give access to a language that already has all this. (Twisted is the most powerful way to do networking under Python, bar none -= DEPENDENCIES =- There ought to be some simple mechanism that one Script can use to tell UR that it depends on another script. E.g. The script GmailSync might depend on MetaScript >= 2.0. MetaScript could be a Script that provides various library routines that are useful to multipe Scripts, and it may provide some mechanisms to allow inter-script communication (over loopback sockets or Windows Pipes, etc). Or it could also provide a simple mechanism for a given Script to enumerate other loaded Scripts and get references to their public objects, allowing direct communication and collaboration between scripts. -= CONCLUSION =- So basically I want to be able to do EVERYTHING. But I know that I won't get that in the end... That's OK. Even a small fraction of these things, exposed through a powerful language, would be very useful. The word "Script" is kind of misleading... I probably should have used the word Plugin or Extension above. The very first thing you guys could do would be to allow direct SQLite access to ENCRYPTED database files. There are plenty of things I could do on my own if I just had that. Of course it's not pretty, and it's not very safe, and it's not gonna be forward-compatible. But I'll take it! I'll take, and be grateful for (and pay for!) anything you give us. But of course, the more the better! P.S. Thanks for taking the time to read this. I spent quite a lot of time thinking and writing, however it is still only a first draft, and I look forward to constructive comments. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|