#31
|
|||
|
|||
more thoughts on this
I was browsing a blog earlier today and they had a tag
cloud. I could easily see what were the dominant themes of the blog without having to read a single entry. A relevance list would be useful, but it's not the same. Really - if you think about it, you know this is true. A relevance list as discussed in this thread presumably shows you the most relevant ITEM TITLES - which may or may not reveal the most dominant themes. Let me spell this out to avoid confusion: I could, in principle, give each item an arbitrary title, like asdfsdf and jlkjlkjl. And the content could be ordinary content, like an import from various websites. So there is no logical connection between an item's title and its content. The only connections are by intention. Period. But a tag cloud wouldn't care. It simply reads the entire content and reveals the dominant themes, no matter what I titles I give the items. And clicking a cloud item would, I hope, reveal all the Explorer Pane items associated with the tag cloud word. I would personally find this tremendously helpful - mainly after import of lots of new content - but in general as well. Regards, Bal |
|
|