|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: How useful would "inter-field" validations be on custom action propety dialogs? | |||
| Very important! (needs aren't met due to the lack of this feature) |
   
|
1 | 50.00% |
| Somewhat Important. (We have found ways around it, but we really want to have that feature) |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| Unimportant. (However "nice" it would be we don't see our organization using it) |
  
|
1 | 50.00% |
| What do you mean by "inter-field" validations? |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| Voters: 2. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
07-16-2003, 10:13 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Future User Action edit field features ...
Part of the work that we do works with a StarTeam server.
Which requires the user to type in a password. Storing passwords in plain text and displaying them as plain text of course can pose a security breach. If it's possible, it would be nice to see, at mimimum, the "password" property of edit boxes being provided via the XML format provided (i.e. Password="1" within the field tag) Ideally such an item would also perform trivial encryption to prevent a casual user from recovering the password from a build file by mere visual inspection. 
|
|
|
Threaded Mode