Kinook Software Forum

Go Back   Kinook Software Forum > Ultra Recall > [UR] Suggestions
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-14-2005, 03:21 AM
Will Eatherton Will Eatherton is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: 01-14-2005
Posts: 17
Losing track of near, long, never feature addition plans

I have been using UR for month or two now and checking in on the boards at least weekly. One thing I am starting to get confused about is that when I think of a new feature that would be really nice I have trouble remembering if that has been already flagged as near/long/never or if it is a brand new request. I can narrow this down some with searches of forum but still little confusing.

I know you dont want to make comittments but if there was a list on the website that head near/long/never categories of feature plans that might cut down on redundant requests and give folks a rough idea of what might be coming down the pipe.

Will
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-14-2005, 06:55 PM
kevina kevina is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: 03-27-2003
Posts: 825
We do have a list of features internally but have hesitated to publish it on the forum/website to avoid over-committing concerning specific features or deadlines (as you mention) but also to avoid broadcasting our future plans to competitors...

We are considering an additional forum that would provide a clearer list of future features and their potential order of implementation which would be accessible only to licensed users. Does this seem like a reasonable approach?

This would, of course, add some overhead for us (both providing these additional rights to eligible users, and maintaining this feature list on the forum) and we haven't yet finalized the best procedure to manage either...

We are committed to maintaining the best relationship possible with our users, without expending excessive effort (which reduces the amount of time we have to develop these new features!).
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-14-2005, 10:22 PM
Will Eatherton Will Eatherton is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: 01-14-2005
Posts: 17
I understand the issues which is why I was suggeseting keeping the time frame categories pretty general. To some degree you have already gone down this path to some degree with the type of detailed replies you have given in the forums (we are working ont his, this is long term plan but difficult and not immediate, this does not fit with our plans).

As to effort I guess you have to weigh the effort of maintaing such a list against effort in replying to redundant questions and effort of customers searching through forums to see if a given suggestion has already been answered. I would like this type of high level roadmap but won't be upset if you decide it is not worth the time.

Will
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-22-2005, 11:56 AM
HalfCyborg HalfCyborg is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: 02-03-2005
Posts: 18
I would love to see some sort of plan for upcoming features. I don't think the list would need to be tied to a particular version and/or timeframe. Maybe just grouped into High, Med and Low priority so if everyone was passionate about a particular feature it might get bumped up in the queue.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:17 PM.


Copyright © 1999-2023 Kinook Software, Inc.