Kinook Software Forum

Go Back   Kinook Software Forum > Ultra Recall > [UR] General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-18-2011, 04:34 AM
schferk schferk is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: 11-02-2010
Posts: 151
False Search Results ?

When I do an advanced search "Default Child Template" "Not" "Equals" "Text", I get ALL my items as a result, when in fact most of them have indeed that default child template, as can be seen when selecting them, one by one, and checking the attributes pane. (Please note the NOT in the search expression.)

In the attributes pane, those attributes "Template Item" and "Default Child Template" are given without any icon (as expected), whereas in the advanced search, the "Text" part is proposed only WITH an icon (since there is a drop down list of given templates) - is it there, the error, do I again something wrong, or is it a known issue ?

The aim of my search is, of course, to identify the (rare) exceptions of my rule that almost all items should have text items as default child items, and to check if there are items that don't have that default child template by accident, it is not to have ALL my items in the finds list, 99,9 p.c. of them there by error.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-18-2011, 12:08 PM
kinook kinook is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: 03-06-2001
Location: Colorado
Posts: 6,003
This is fixed in the latest build (UltraRecall.exe 4.2.0.9).
http://www.kinook.com/Forum/showthre...?threadid=4608
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-24-2011, 05:22 PM
schferk schferk is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: 11-02-2010
Posts: 151
Oh, I see, thank you very much. In the meantime, I discovered another bug which probably has also been fixed: I assign the ("user-defined") keyword "net" to some items, in order to have a to-do-list for (grouped) net research, and in the same way, "print" in order to print various items in a row when at the office. Well, ALL my items are "found" as "matching" results... my cross on "search only user-defined keywords" notwithstanding...

BTW, UR's cloning feature being such a marvel, keywords ain't that necessary in general, but I'm trying them for "to do's", whereas cloning, in this scenario, is for things belonging permanently into two or more categories... but then, for the time being, for a to-do, whilst the keyword ASSIGNMENT is faster than cloning into another (= to do) category, the REMOVAL of a (not needed anymore) clone is faster than that of a (not needed anymore) keyword: So I'm in doubt as to whether even for to-do's, cloning's not perhaps the better way...

But, again and again, UR's cloning feature is outstanding and sheer joy to put in use.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-25-2011, 03:40 PM
kinook kinook is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: 03-06-2001
Location: Colorado
Posts: 6,003
This is fixed in the latest release (4.2a).
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-26-2011, 07:53 AM
schferk schferk is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: 11-02-2010
Posts: 151
I had thought so. Just great! ;-)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:18 AM.


Copyright © 1999-2023 Kinook Software, Inc.