#1
|
|||
|
|||
Wordpad vs Word
Except for some fancy options -- many of which aren't used IMO -- I'm wondering if it wouldn't be faster/more efficient to use Wordpad as the external doc editor.
Maybe I'm being simplistic but loading Word is so big, it's a PITA. As an aside, I also think that URp's dictionary forces an extra step, i.e. user has to click suggestions to get a list of words rather than seeing them in the first layer of the dialog. OK.... now you can jump on me. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Wordpad vs Word
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
PS: are you really still using "w2k-sp4" Last edited by zargron; 07-24-2007 at 10:09 PM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Re: Wordpad vs Word
Quote:
As for dictionary, forget it. Just ignore this. Drugs wore off before I wrote that. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Wordpad vs Word
Quote:
Quote:
I wrote that before the drugs wore off. Last edited by zargron; 07-25-2007 at 08:21 AM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Re: Wordpad vs Word
Quote:
That is, unless user has work issues, i.e. distribution of word documents with corrections, etc. in which case user could probably link to it & "open with" Word. OTOH, maybe I'm missing something. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Re: Re: Wordpad vs Word
Quote:
To be honest janrif I don't pause for too long to ponder the seemingly unnecessary complexity of modern word processors. My work & study history makes me pretty strong with ye old WP knowledge. It's quite easy for me to soak up such features as templates, drawing tools, master documents, spell checking, fields like TOC, hyperlinks, bullets, numbering, tables, merging... and I wouldn't like to do without them. |
|
|